Win the Game to Leave the Game

There are founders who've won but can't stop playing.

They sold for eight figures. They've got more money than they'll spend in three lifetimes. And they're still checking their portfolio like it's a scoreboard, still optimising for returns they don't need, still chasing the next deal like someone's keeping score.

Nobody is keeping score.

Here's the thing most people get wrong about games: the point of winning isn't to keep winning. The point of winning is to be done. You beat the level. You unlock the next one. You don't replay the same boss fight forever just because you were good at it.

James Carse wrote about this distinction in Finite and Infinite Games: "A finite game is played for the purpose of winning, an infinite game for the purpose of continuing the play." Wealth-building is a finite game. You play it to win, which means you play it to finish. Life is the infinite game. The only way to lose is to forget you're playing it.

Most founders confuse the two. They treat the finite game like it's infinite. They keep accumulating past the point of utility because the scoreboard has become their identity.

You're Already Playing

Games exist whether you acknowledge them or not. Economic games, status games, career games, social games — you were born into them without consent. Pretending they don't matter doesn't make you enlightened. It makes you vulnerable.

If you don't understand the rules, the rules still apply. If you refuse to play, you lose by default.

This is why the "I don't care about money" posture is usually fake. Either you have enough that you genuinely don't need to care, or you're performing detachment while still constrained by scarcity. The first is freedom. The second is cope.

Founders understand this intuitively. You didn't build a company by opting out of competition. You learned which metrics actually mattered, which conventional wisdom was wrong, who the real decision-makers were. You played the game seriously because playing it well was the only path to anything meaningful.

The problem starts when you forget the point was to finish.

When The Game Starts Playing You

There's a moment where the scoreboard stops being a tool and becomes a trap.

Games are designed to capture attention. They offer clean metrics, fast feedback, external validation. They tell you exactly how you're doing and what to chase next. That clarity is seductive. Over time, the game stops being something you play and becomes something that plays you.

Daniel Kahneman and Angus Deaton's research at Princeton found that emotional wellbeing stops improving after roughly $75,000 per year (about $100K in today's dollars). Beyond that threshold, more money improves your evaluation of your life — you rate yourself as more successful — but it doesn't actually make you feel better day to day.

Read that again. After a certain point, money changes how you score yourself without changing how you feel.

This is the trap. The number keeps going up. The satisfaction flatlines. But you can't stop because the game never sent you a "You Win" screen.

Bryan Johnson sold Braintree for roughly $300 million. Instead of compounding that into billions — something he openly admits he could have done by "doing boring, competent things" — he walked away from the wealth game entirely. He now measures success with a single filter: will this matter in 200 years?

That's not anti-ambition. It's recognising that he beat the money level. Replaying it would just be grinding.

Level Complete vs. Game Over

Here's a distinction that matters: there's a difference between quitting because you're exhausted and quitting because you're finished.

Founders who burn out exit with regret. They wonder what would have happened if they'd pushed harder, held on longer, played a few more rounds. The game still owns them because they didn't beat it — they just stopped.

Founders who complete the level exit differently. They're calm. Unimpressed by the scoreboard. Unhurried. They might still play other games, but lightly, without desperation. The anxiety is gone because the stakes are gone.

Vinay Hiremath, co-founder of Loom, walked away from a $60 million earn-out after the company sold for nearly a billion dollars. He could have stayed. The money was guaranteed. Instead, he recognised something: "Liquidity solves safety, not direction."

He beat the level. The earn-out was just bonus content. He chose to move on.

Oscar, a self-made billionaire who built a single company into a $50 billion enterprise over 40 years, describes it differently. His stated exit strategy is "death" — not as a joke, but as a commitment to playing the ownership game indefinitely because that's the game he wants to play. He's not grinding for a number. He's playing because control is the actual prize.

Same principle, different game. Both men understood what they were playing for.

Trap of Quitting Too Early

Some people reject ambition, competition, or money altogether and call it freedom. They've confused leaving the arena with transcending it.

Scarcity is not liberation.

If you withdraw without first winning, you're not free — you're just constrained by lack instead of excess. You're still reacting to the game rather than choosing your relationship with it.

Shane Cultra walked away from a $10 million family business with roughly $3 million liquid. The hard part wasn't the money. It was walking away from what everyone expected — the family game, the wealth game, the "what will people think" game.

But notice: he chose enough from a position where enough was actually available. He wasn't running from something he never had. He was declining something he could have kept.

True freedom comes from completing the game, not abandoning it mid-level.

What Winning Unlocks

Think about what happens when you beat a video game. Really beat it — final boss, credits roll, the whole thing.

You don't lose your skills. You don't forget the levels. You're just... done. The compulsion is gone. You might play through again on a harder difficulty if you enjoy the mechanics. But the urgency, the need to prove something, the sense that you're not complete until you finish — that's over.

Money works the same way.

The real prize isn't having money. It's reaching the point where money stops being a variable in your decisions. Where you can say no without calculating the cost. Where you can walk away from a deal because you don't like the people, not because you can't afford to be picky.

Steve Houghton, whose net worth sits in the high nine to low ten figures, puts it simply: "Money magnifies who you already are."

He built wealth through decades of patient compounding and a pathological refusal to sell great assets. When he first reached financial independence, the moment felt anticlimactic. The absence of urgency created a brief identity vacuum.

That vacuum is the transition. It's what happens when the old game ends and the new one hasn't started yet.

Hedonic Treadmill

There's a reason why rich people often seem no happier than middle-class people, even when they're objectively more secure.

Researchers call it "hedonic adaptation" — the tendency to return to a baseline level of happiness after both positive and negative life changes. You win the lottery, you're thrilled, then six months later, you're basically the same person you were before. You lose a limb, you're devastated, then two years later, your day-to-day wellbeing has mostly returned to baseline.

The treadmill works on everything: promotions, houses, cars, net worth. The boost is temporary. The adaptation is permanent.

This is why founders worth $50 million still feel anxious about market swings. This is why founders worth $100 million still check their portfolios daily and let the number dictate their mood. The game trained them to optimise for a metric that stopped producing real returns a long time ago.

If your net worth dictates your mood, you haven't beaten the level. The level is still beating you.

Next Level

So what comes after money?

The founders I know who've genuinely completed the wealth game — not abandoned it, completed it — tend to play different games afterwards.

Some play the family game with real attention, not as a hobby between deals. Some play the health game with the same intensity they brought to building companies. Some play the giving game, or the mentoring game, or the "see how weird I can make my life" game.

The common thread: they're playing games they chose, not games they inherited.

Bryan Johnson plays the longevity game — not because he's afraid of dying, but because he thinks human lifespan is an interesting problem and he has the resources to take a real swing at it. Whether he's right or delusional is beside the point. He's playing a game that he selected, not one that selected him.

Andrew Wilkinson, who built his wealth through MetaLab and Tiny, plays a different post-money game. He systematically sold off the status purchases that didn't hold up — exotic cars, multiple houses, yacht charters. What actually stuck? A primary home designed for family life. A lake house less than an hour away (high usage matters more than high price). Private aviation, but only because it compresses time.

"Being rich isn't about buying more," he says. "It's about owning less that matters more."

Both men beat the money level. They just chose different next games.

How You Know You've Won

There's no "You Win" notification for life. Nobody hands you a trophy. The game doesn't tell you when you're done.

So how do you know?

Here's the test: Can you walk away from any opportunity — not just the bad ones, but the good ones — without anxiety? Can you say no to a deal that would make you richer because you just... don't want it?

Not "can you afford to say no." That's about math. I mean: can you actually do it without the voice in your head screaming that you're leaving money on the table?

The founders who've beaten the level can. The founders who are still grinding can't.

This isn't about reaching a specific number. I know founders worth $20 million who are free and founders worth $200 million who are trapped. The number is necessary but not sufficient. The shift is internal.

Playing to Continue vs. Playing to Finish

Here's where Carse's framework becomes practical.

Finite games have win conditions. You achieve them, the game ends, you move on. Building a company is a finite game. Accumulating a portfolio is a finite game. Reaching financial independence is a finite game.

Infinite games have no win conditions. The point is to keep playing. Relationships are infinite games. Health is an infinite game. Your life — the whole thing, not any particular project within it — is an infinite game.

The mistake founders make is treating finite games like they're infinite. They keep optimising the portfolio even after they've won because they never defined what "winning" meant. They keep chasing deals because the game never told them they could stop.

The healthier approach: define your win condition in advance. What number or milestone means "I'm done with this level"? When you reach it, actually stop. Move to the next game.

You were never meant to live inside the wealth game. You were meant to finish it.

Quiet After

The people who've genuinely won don't look like winners.

They're calm. Unhurried. Unimpressed by scoreboards that used to consume them. They still participate — in markets, in deals, in building things — but lightly. Playfully. Without the desperate energy of someone who needs the outcome.

The game becomes a tool, not a master.

That's the real prize. Not the money. Not the status. Not even the freedom in the abstract.

It's being done.

I write when there’s something worth sharing — playbooks, signals, and patterns I’m seeing among founders building, exiting, and managing real capital.
If that’s useful, you can subscribe here.